How Popes John XXIII and Paul VI Responded to Our Lady of Fatima

Greetings in Jesus and Mary....

This article is not a happy one. In conversations with my close friends, I have stated many times that it would be nice to write a "fiction" book on the state of the world IF THOSE INSTRUCTED BY HEAVEN DID AS THEY WERE TOLD! France was told to consecrate itself to the Sacred Heart 100 years before the King and Queen were guillotined and the Freemasons threw out the Monarchy and set up a New Republic.
Lucia informed her Bishop that the Pope in Rome was suppose to reveal the Third Secret in 1960 (because it would be more clear to the world then). BUT below is the story of what happened.

I have taken these segments from the book The Fourth Secret by Antonio Socci.....

ACTIONS DONE BY POPE JOHN XXIII (Canonized by "Pope" Francis in 2014)

"After having read it (The Third Secret), in the face of the Madonna's request that Her words be revealed to the world in 1960—the message of the Queen of Prophets not being to his liking—Pope Roncalli decided to do exactly the opposite: He decided to bury the message and not to give any explanation, either to the Church or to the world. Finally, as we have seen, he caused to be attached to the envelope from Sister Lucia his heavy opinion, destined to weigh down upon his successors, according to which the message “could be a manifestation of the divine and could not be.” As if to insinuate that it involved the fantasies of a nun. Nevertheless, it was precisely in 1959 that signs and news of extraordinary graces continued to be linked to a pilgrimage in Italy of the statue of the Madonna of Fatima, the coldness of Roncalli was evident. “The statue of the Madonna of Fatima,’ writes Frere Michel, “arrived at Rome on September 14. It remained there until the 17th. During these three days, great solemn ceremonies were conducted at the Flaminio Stadium, at the Church of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and at the Basilica of St. John Lateran. The Mayor of Rome welcomed the Virgin of Fatima. The crowds flocked in to see Her. But Pope John XXIII did not move. He did not pronounce even a single word of welcome to the Virgin, who visited his diocese at the end of a triumphal voyage around the world.” Pope Roncalli did not even wish to receive the proposal by the Bishop of Leiria to renew the consecration of the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary performed by Pius XII.".........

"The message of Fatima evidently was felt to be profoundly embarrassing by one who was preparing to agree to what he thought to be a masterpiece of diplomacy and ecumenism: a pact with the Kremlin to have two Russian Orthodox observers at the Council, guaranteeing to that regime, in exchange, that the Council would not formulate any condemnation of Communism or the Soviet system.” Beyond the judgment (the worst possible) that one must give to this compromise of the “moral liberty” of the Catholic Church and of the Council itself, and moreover in return for a mess of pottage (two orthodox observers well-chosen and controlled by the KGB), one remains horrified in the face of a Council—what is more, a “pastoral” council, and thus one occupied with the historical reality of the Church—that pronounces itself on everything, but does not proffer a single word on the ideology of a regime that since 1917 had realized (and was still realizing in those years) on a planetary scale the most immense and bloody work of eradication, extermination, and persecution of the Church in its bimillenial history."

(My comment - this is beyond belief! Very traitorous and must have made the Virgin Mary weep over the insults to Her Son Jesus!)

ACTIONS DONE BY POPE PAUL VI (Canonized by "Pope" Francis in 2018)

The decisions and choices of John XXIII were also followed by his successor Paul VI, who—for his own part—added the annoyed and public rejection of Sister Lucia: “It is said that Lucia that day at Fatima asked for a meeting with the Pope,’ recalls John Guitton, who was his friend and confidante. The Pope responded brusquely: “Address yourself to your bishop. According to his French friend, “Paul VI had a sort of generic aversion for visionaries. He maintained that, since revelation is complete, the Church has no need of these things, to which one must not give an exaggerated importance.’ Are the “little ones” chosen by Mary despised? Are prophecies despised? Aura Miguel has observed that on the day he rejected a meeting with Sister Lucia, the last living visionary of Fatima, at the Portuguese sanctuary, Paul VI “received that evening civil and military authorities, members of the government and the diplomatic corps. The Pope also held an audience with the Portuguese episcopate, with representatives of Catholic Action and with other Christian churches. Returning to the Monte Real Airport, he found the time to make a visit to the monastery of Batalha.’’ Why did he have time for everyone except she whom the Madonna had chosen as Her messenger? Fifteen days later in response to a question by John Guitton: “What impression do you have of Lucia?”, Pope Montini gave an answer in which everything shows through: “Oh, she is a very simple girl! She is a peasant without complications.” The aristocratic Montini, the intellectual of French formation, did not mention that the Madonna had chosen that girl as a depository of Her exceptional message to the Church and to humanity. He saw in Lucia only “a peasant.”

It was precisely Montini—the Pope according to whom “the Church does not have need” of the extraordinary assistance of the Madonna and can do without Her maternal aid—who shortly thereafter had to recognize dramatically that, within a few years of the Council’s conclusion, the Church was in the process of “autodemolition.”” Paul VI even shouted out desperately his apocalyptic feeling that “from somewhere or other, the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God” Then he added bitterly: “Tt was believed that after the Council there would come a day of sunshine in the history of the Church. Instead there came a day of clouds, tempests, of darkness.” Pope Montini hinted at some self-criticism (“The opening to the Church became a true and proper invasion of the Church by worldly thinking. We have perhaps been too weak and imprudent”). However, it was seen quite clearly who had opened the door to the world and to the “smoke of Satan.” In fact, he persisted in error: The most devastating of the errors was the traumatic “coup detat” by a “minority revolution” that imposed the liturgical reform (with its thousand abuses), hailed by Paul VI but clearly not blessed by God. The prohibition of the millennial Latin liturgy of the Church was effectuated by a decision that contravened even the documents of the Council. The modality and contents of this “coup detat” have had disastrous effects on the orthodoxy and faith of the people, while—as the writer Guido Ceronetti has noted—that folly “pleased Communist authorities... who were not stupid, having in their bestial ignorance of the sacred perceived that a crack had been opened.” Paradoxically, even then the enormity of the error was recognized more by the world of culture, even lay culture, than by the ecclesiastical class, who were sometimes modernists, and in other cases superficial and ignorant, or opportunistic and cowardly. The harshest factual judgment on the methods and contents of this reform was given by a pastor as conciliar as Joseph Ratzinger: “I am convinced that the ecclesial crisis in which we find ourselves today depends in great part on the collapse of the liturgy, which sometimes comes to be conceived ‘as if God does not exist’: as if it no longer matters whether God is there and is seen and heard in it. But if in the liturgy there no longer appears the communion of the faith, the universal unity of the Church and of her history, where does the Church appear in her spiritual substance?”

CONCLUSION....
Now that so many years have passed since 1960 (65 years). We can see the damage that was caused by NOT CONSECRATING RUSSIA TO THE IMMACULATE HEART AS OUR LADY HAD ASKED. THIS LACK OF RESPONSE AND PRIDE BROUGHT THESE TREMENDOUS CONSEQUENCES. As stated in previous articles, WE ARE SEEING THAT THIS CHURCH WANTS TO SEE THE LATIN MASS DESTROYED! IN DETROIT ....THEY HAVE TO GO AS OF JULY 1ST. IS THE NEW POPE GOING TO CONTINUE THIS DEMOLITION?Again, I must repeat that it is not about "tradition per se" ...it is about the flow of GRACE in the world with the unbloody sacrifice on the altar of the Latin Mass. I am not a theologian but from all the changes they did to the "NEW MASS" there is always question of its validity. Proper Matter, Form and Intention must be there. They have changed the Form, Some have changed the Matter and Who Knows about the Intention of these Modernists.  Anyone for writing a novel on what would have happened we were obedient to Heaven and its commands???

Let us do our part and daily pray the Rosary, frequent the Sacraments (Latin Mass), pray the Fatima prayers of Reparation DAILY! Know that in the end.....Her Immaculate Heart will Triumph. I am convinced that when there is a renewal in the Church...the New Mass will be no more and only the true Mass will survive. If we must go under until that day comes as in past Catholic History...then we must do that. If we are called to die for defending the true Mass like Edmund Campion and Margaret Clithrow....then Praised Be Jesus Christ for choosing us!

We are sad creatures!   Holy Mother Mary.....pray for us!
And may the day come when all that this Council did will be null and void and may we go back to the pre-Vatican II days of being Catholic! Pray for all those who were lost and are still being lost. May Our Lady lead us back to Her Son and may we remain faithful till the end!  

---

The Fourth Secret by Antonio Socci pdf

New Book on Prayer for Popes